Advertising

What Is Most Important – Copy Or Pic?

Learn Advertising on mps-advertising.com. What Is Most Important – Copy Or Pic? article will help answer your questions on Advertising.We at mps-advertising.com specialize in Advertising. Advertising at mps-advertising.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

Among the hardy perennials of our debates was the relevance of sex in advertising, and also the question of whether the copy element in ads was more important than the visual or vice versa.

Of course, these were the days when it was possible for ag

When, some little time ago now, I first descended upon the proclamation scene, we were a good deal more concerned than most people seem to be today relative to the nature of the deal we found ourselves in. We were constantly holding debates – in the saloon bar of the prescribe & Horses in New Bond Street, to be tiresomely precise – pertinent to the meaning of advertising, the significance of advertising, and the past, present and future of advertising. And an unconscionably serious lot we no doubt were. Not to mention drunk.

Among the hardy perennials of our debates was the relevance of sex in advertising, and also the question of whether the copy element in ads was more important than the visual or vice versa.

Of course, these were the days when it was possible for warrant personnel to slope off round the pub during working hours and nobody on the management side of things turned so much as a hair at our absence. Just so long as the work got done on time, nobody gave so much as a tinker’s cuss whether you were doing it in the office or down at the dog track. These days, agencies are a little more sanguine in their solicit to creative people; and I recently heard of a designer fresh sacked on the spot for turning up at a prospect meeting wearing jeans – and I kid you not.

But back to our hardy perennials. The ‘sex in advertising’ question was a hotly debated topic, mainly in that the copywriters and designers in my milieu were unceasingly cautious to hark the relevant photo-shoots, and not sex was liable to help sell anything. Thus, we were constantly near future up with speculative ad campaigns that featured semi-clad females so that we might golden vision a glimpse of a naked thigh or better. Few of these concepts saw the light of day, but it was without stopping worth a try.

As to the copy versus pic argument, this has still not been resolved to this day. Then, as now, I was on the side of the angels, holding that close 80 per cent of ads could, at a pinch, do without illustrations, whereas only in respect to 2 per cent could do without words. (In regard to the other 18 per cent, you can make your own arrangements.)

Such an argument, as you’d expect, was met with widespread sign by the designers, who saw that I was presaging their redundancy. Then as now, they would do everything they could to give their illustrations the prominence they thought they deserved. This usually resulted in a design in which the pic took up four-fifths of the ad, while the copy was relegated to eight-point solid and rendered practically illegible.

My attitude, obviously, was simply a debating stance – true though it undoubtedly is. I am not suggesting for a moment that 8 out of 10 ads should be wholly typographical. But if you take a dispassionate look in the vicinity you, you might approve with me that a whole lot of ads (and brochures and websites, too, come to that) delight pictures for pictures’ sake; and that in quite a few cases the pictures, far from helping the transmission of a message, undoubtedly hinder it.

The main offenders in this respect are what might be describes as semi-industrial ads. Just leaf through a trade mag (or pamphlet or website) and you’ll see irrelevance in illustration well approved out. You’ll see, for instance, pictures of the factory or, as they call it these days, the production operation. You’ll see pics of two obvious male models in white coats staring idiotically at a computer screen or a blueprint. And you’ll see pics of two obvious male models, plus a female model, in white coats staring idiotically at a computer screen. The female is included in the latter pic considering the designer had originally planned for her to be shot with her robe off.

Here’s what I think. With today’s wonderful digital photography opportunities, with an instant replay of whatever has been shot, one might hope that illustrations in ads, brochures and websites might be made more relevant. They might undeniably show the product in rumble – demonstration is, in harmony with all, the soul of advertising. But, no, we still get pics which have nothing whatsoever to do with the product or its benefits.

I don’t mind admitting that there can be few people in the whole wide world who know less alongside photography than I do. What I do know, however, is that promotional material is far tower above off without an illustration if that illustration does not bulk the sales message. So, in this respect, copy is more important than illustration.

Mind you, there is a lot of copy only a step that doesn’t pyramid the sales message either. But that’s story.

More Articles: